Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21664 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. The present writ petition has been preferred with the following main reliefs:-
"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R dated 25/7/2026 registered as Case Crime No.0218/2026, under Sections 221, 329(3) B.N.S., Police Station Mirzamurad, District/unit Gomti Commissionrate Varansi (Annexure-1) to this writ petition. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the F.I.R dated 25/7/2026 registered as Case Crime No. 0218/2026, under Sections 221, 329(3) B.N.S., Police Station Mirzamurad, District/unit Gomti Commissionrate Varansi."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner after some length of arguments on merits made an innocuous prayer that before arresting the petitioner police may be directed to follow the principle laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273.
3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposed the petition on merits but he has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Mishra, Anil Kumar Tripathi, Nagendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Hemant Kumar Patel .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. S.N. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and no objection by learned A.G.A. on innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, we are inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
6. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities concerned to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 and provision of Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S. October 8, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 21664 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad