Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15152 (RAJ)

POONAM DAUGHTER OF SHRI RAMDUTT WIFE OF VISHNU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/23/2026 · 2026-01-12

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1192] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 23/2026 1. Poonam Daughter Of Shri Ramdutt Wife Of Vishnu, Resident Of Sakhwara, Dholpur (Raj.), At Present Resident Of Katra Rithauri, District Agra, Utter Pradesh. 2. Vishnu Son Of Shri Gulab Singh, Resident Of Katra Rithauri, District Agra, Utter Pradesh. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur (Rajasthan). 4. S.h.o., Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur (Raj.). 5. Ramdutt Son Of Lahoredas, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 6. Urmila Wife Of Ramdutt, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 7. Harendra Son Of Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 8. Shivdutt Son Of Lahoredas, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 9. Bholu Son Of Ramdutt, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 10. Deepak Son Of Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 11. Dhammada Son Of Jagdish, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 12. Aashish Son Of Shivdutt, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 13. Neeraj Son Of Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 14. Rohit Son Of Shivdutt, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 15. Satendra Son Of Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. [2026:RJ-JP:1192] (2 of 3) [CRLW-23/2026] 16. Bebi Wife Of Shivdutt, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 17. Mahadevi Wife Of Lahoredas, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 18. Shakuntla Wife Of Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 19. Somwati Wife Of Sanjay, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 20. Lalita Wife Of Mathuradas, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 21. Pintu Son Of Yashdutt, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 22. Mathuradas Son Of Lochandas, Resident Of Sakhbara, Police Station Kaulari, District Dholpur. 23. Subhash Son Of Radheshyam, Resident Of Rasilpur, Police Station Rudawal, District Bharatpur. 24. Piyush Son Of Mukesh, Resident Of Shilra, Police Station Saiya, District Agra (UP). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/01/2026 1. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 24 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:1192] (3 of 3) [CRLW-23/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Shivpuri Kamta, Chinhat, Lucknow on 10.12.2025. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 24 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 4. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4- Station House Officer, Police Station, Kaulari, District Dholpur (Raj.) and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 5. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this order shall not prejudice/affect any other legal proceedings initiated between the parties. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /367