( 2026:HHC:28013 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.785 of 2026 Date of decision: 10.07.2026 Blue Lotus Residences ….Petitioner Versus Rajesh Agrawal & Ors. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Amrit, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.3 & 4. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, has placed on record communication dated 15.05.2026, wherein it has been stated that upon examination in terms of criteria laid down under tClause 7.3 of the Scheme, the Committee was of the view that the unit was not prima facie eligible for consideration. Additionally, in the absence of any budgetary allocation, the committee was of the view that the application could not be considered eligible. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2026:HHC:28013 ) 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, it is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under the law. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge July 10, 2026 (reena)