GORJALA VIJAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/11411/2026 · 2026-04-27
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1515 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1515 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010209512026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11411/2026 Between:
1. GORJALA VIJAY KUMAR, S/O LATE BHASKAR NAIDU, OCC FARMER, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, E. NO. 1-30, VADRAMPALLE VILLAGE, KANIPAKAM POST, IRALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -517131. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO PANCHAYAT RAJ, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, TULLURUMANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE - 522237. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, O/O THE DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, REDDY GUNTA, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE -517001. 3. DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, O/O THE DISTRICTCOLLECTORATE,
REDDY GUNTA, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE -517001. 4. THE MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, IRALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517130. 5. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, VADRAMPALLE VILLAGE AND PANCHAYAT, KANIPAKAM POST, IRALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -517131.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 5 in not taking action on my representation dt.01.04.2026 to remove the illegal encroachments such as unauthorized structures, dumping of garbage and construction material on the C.C. Roads laid in the Vadrampalle Village and Panchayat, Kanipakam Post, Irala Mandal, ChittoorDistrictwhich became difficultfor ingress otd egress for myself and my family members during emergencies is as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Natural Justice and violation of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitutional of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 to consider my representation dt.01.04.2026 and to take necessary action on the illegal encroachments such as unauthorized structures, dumping of garbage and construction material on the C.C. Roads laid in the Vadrampalle Village and Panchayat, Kanipakam Post, Irala Mandal, Chittoor District in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 to consider my representation dt.01.04.2026 and to take necessary action on the illegal encroachments such as unauthorized structures, dumping of garbage and construction material on the C.C. Roads laid in the Vadrampalle Village & Panchayat, Kanipakam Post, Irala Mandal, Chittoor District in accordance with law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following:
::ORDER ::
The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is that respondents 2 to 5 are not taking any action to remove the illegal encroachments on the CC
roads laid in Vadrampalle Village & Panchayat, Kanipakam Post, Irala Mandal, Chittoor District, despite the representation dated 01.04.2026. 2. Heard Sri D. Kishore Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, appeared for respondents 1 to 3 and Ms. Kavitha, learned counsel representing Sri M. Sudhir, learned Standing Counsel, appeared for respondents 4 & 5. 3. The writ petition was filed on 17.04.2026, and on the same day, papers were served on the learned Government Pleader and learned Standing Counsel. 4. The writ petition was listed on 28-4-2026 for admission. Today, when the matter is listed, Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader and Ms. Kavitha, learned counsel appearing for Gram Panchayat, submitted that no instructions were furnished by the respondents, despite intimation regarding the filing of a writ petition. 5. It is very unfortunate that, in several writ petitions, the Panchayat Secretaries of the respective Gram Panchayats are hardly responding and sending information to the learned Standing Counsel to enable them to place the same before this Court. 6. Most of the writ petitions, in the Panchayat branch, are being filed complaining of constructions made by the neighbouring individuals, without permission from the Gram Panchayat and the inaction on the part of the officials. Some other writ petitions are complaining of inaction regarding the encroachments. The prompt instructions from the respondent authorities will help the Court in passing appropriate orders. 7. In the case at hand, the relief sought in the main writ petition and in the interlocutory applications are the same i.e. consideration of representation made by the petitioner on 01.04.2026, to remove the illegal encroachments,
such as unauthorised constructions, dumping of garbage and construction material on the CC roads laid in Vadrampalle Village & Panchayat. In fact, the petitioner pleaded that such unauthorised acts are causing obstruction to reach his house. Hence, the petitioner made a representation through registered post to respondents 2 to 5 on 02.04.2026 & 04.04.2026, respectively. However, the representations were not attended to. 8.
Given the facts and circumstances of the case, since the prayer sought for is innocuous, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of learned counsel appearing on either side, directing the respondents 2 to 5 or the concerned to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 01.04.2026 and pass appropriate orders, strictly as per the Rules. The registry is directed to furnish a copy of this order to the learned Principal Secretary to Panchayat Raj – respondent No.1. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 28.04.2026 TVN
189 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 11411 of 2026
Date: 28.04.2026 TVN