Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15148 (BOM)

THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR v. KUNDLIK HARIBA SONWANE

FA/2249/2010 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

229-FA-2249-10.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 229 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2249 OF 2010 The State Of Mah And Anr VERSUS Kundlik Hariba Sonwane …… Mr. A.D. Wange, AGP for Appellant-State …… CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 28 SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant/State. 2. By this appeal, the Appellant assail the Judgment and award dated 28.02.2008 passed by the learned Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur in L.A.R. No.301 of 1991. 3. Learned AGP for the appellant submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 2026:BHC-AUG:46264 229-FA-2249-10.odt 2 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. The Claimant is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any. 7. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE S P Rane