Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040016332026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/92/2026 Winthan Mossang and 2 Ors Son of Late Somkhum Mossang, resident of Khagam Mossang Village, PO and PS Miao, Changlang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Thankam Mossang Age: Occupation : Son of Late Somkhum Mossang resident of Khagam Mossang Village PO and PS Miao Changlang District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Ongong Mossang Age: Occupation : Son of Late Somkhum Mossang resident of Khagam Mossang Village PO and PS Miao Changlang District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Ors represented by the Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Home Department, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh 791111 2:Sinengam Singpho Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Senentang Singpho resident of Village Lewang PO and PS Miao Changlang District Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 2/3 3:Moko Jowlon Singpho Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Moko Nong Sinpho resident of Village Lewang PO and PS Miao District Changlang Arunachal Pradesh. 4:Indengam Singpho Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Inden Nong Sinpho resident of Village Phup District Changlang Arunachal Pradesh. 5:Indenlah Singpho Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Inden Nong Sinpho resident of Village Phup PO and PS Miao District Changlang Arunachal Pradesh. 6:Miyangtang Singpho Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Miyangla Sinpho resident of Village Khagam Singpho PO and PS Miao District Changlang Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Niranjan Sarma, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Khogen Bui BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 28.09.2026 Page No.# 3/3 Heard Ms P. Pradhan, learned counsel for the applicants. The applicants filed this interlocutory application seeking amendment of the connected criminal petition No.40(AP)/2026 by marking annexures which was inadvertently left unmarked. Mr. A. Tatak, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. P. D. Nair, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 6 has no objection to the prayer made by the applicants. Upon consideration of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants and the fact that the respondent has no objection for amendment of the petition, the prayer for amendment in criminal petition No. 40(Ap)/2026 is allowed. Accordingly, the applicant/petitioner is permitted to marked the annexures in the paragraphs 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the connected criminal petition. The applicant is accordingly, permitted to file amended petition. With the above, the instant interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant Digitally signed by TAGE BUNYI Date: 2026.09.28 18:16:25 +05'30'