[2026:RJ-JP:1209] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 321/2026 Farukh S/o Ayub, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Mothooka Gangora, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) Owner Of Vehicle Regis- tration No. RJ05GB6900. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 4. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Bharatpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG for Mr. S. S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 12/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2 2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehi- 1 S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025 2 S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025 [2026:RJ-JP:1209] (2 of 2) [CW-321/2026] cle owned/ possessed by the petitioner was suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the petitioner was not afforded the opportunity of hearing and that the said vehicle is the source of bread and butter of the petitioner and his family. 3. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to the condition that the petitioner will produce his vehicle before the Transport Department, who will examine and inspect the vehicles’ make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. 4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicle to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/ inspection and shall not authorize the vehicle to ply on the road for any other purpose. 5. The petitioner, along with his vehicle concerned, shall report to/ before the respective DTO who passed the order of suspension of registration of the subject vehicle, on 29.01.2026, preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioner. 6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 13.02.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/43