FA 1898/2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1898 OF 2009 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS GANESH JAYWANT SANAP AND ORS ... AGP for appellants/State : Mr. S.S. Dande Advocate for Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr. T.B. Bhosale ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Dated : September 30, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard the learned AGP for the appellants and the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. By this appeal, the appellants assail the Judgment and award dated 5.4.2007 passed by the learned Adhoc Additional District Judge-1 Beed in LAR No. 586/2006. 3. Both the learned advocate submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. They submit that the SLAO has granted compensation at the rate of Rs.452/- per R. and Rs.567/- per R. as against the same, the learned reference court has granted compensation at the rate of Rs.2200/- per R. and thus, the compensation granted is within four times. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government 2026:BHC-AUG:46235 FA 1898/2009 2 Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending civil applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/