Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15133 (AP)

Smt Sompalli Bhargavi v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/22788/2017 · 2026-03-08

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010027592017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22788/2017 Between: 1. SMT SOMPALLI BHARGAVI, W/O T. VENKATARATNAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS OCC: HOUSE WIFE R/O. SANAYAPALEM VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WD & CW DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTIIR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR NELLORE RURAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, - 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NELLORE RURAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 4. THE I C D S PROJECT DIRECTOR NELLORE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, - 5. KESANI RENUKA, W/O. MADHU, R/O. KANDALURU DAM COLONY VILLAGE KAMBHALAPALLE, OF RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF 2 MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondent No.4 in appointing the 5th respondent as anganwadi worker for sanayapalem village Rapur Mandal vide proceedings No. 64/2015 dated 10.11.2015 as illegal arbitrary, contrary to the Government Orders and conditions of notification and also violative of Rule of Reservation and set aside the same, further direct the respondents No. 2,3,& 4 to conduct a detailed enquiry forthwith into the selection and appointment of the 5th respondent as Anganwadi worker basing on the representation made by the petitioner and further direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Anganwadii worker and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 28064 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the appointment of Respondent No. 5 issued by the respondent No. 4 under Proceedings No. 64 of 2015 dated 10.11.2015 pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SREESHYLAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE(AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. PUSHADAPU SUBBA RAO 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22778 of 2017 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 06.03.2026, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 09.03.2026 PSA