IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No. 153 CWP-12338-2026 Date of decision : 23.04.2026 CJ DARCL Logistics Ltd. .…. Petitioner Versus Food Corporation of India another ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Anil Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner (appeared through video conferencing). Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Viney Kumar, Advocate, and Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate, for the respondent(s)-FCI. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) 1. Through this petition, a direction is sought to be issued to the respondents to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 10.04.2026 (Annexure P-6). 2. At the outset, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner’s afore representation dated 10.04.2026 stands decided through order dated 22.04.2026 and that such order has also been conveyed to the petitioner. 3. In the light of the above, this petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 4. Needless to add that since through order dated 22.04.2026, the petitioner’s afore representation has been decided to the petitioner’s prejudice, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the same, if so advised. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE 23.04.2026 [LAPITA BANERJI] shamsher JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.05.01 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh