- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12168 RSA No. 1506 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1506 OF 2014 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI H CHANNIGARAYAPPA S/O LATE SANTHEKATTE HONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS NOW R/A MALLESHWARA EXTENSION IJOR, RAMANAGARA TOWN DIST.RAMANAGARA – 571 511 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GANGI REDDY B V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI KRISHNAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES SMT JAYAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/A KALLUGOPAHALLI (HALLUR HOSADIDDI) BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGRA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 571511 Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12168 RSA No. 1506 of 2014 2. SRI K SHIVASHANKAR S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/A KALLUGOPAHALLI (HALLUR HOSADIDDI) BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGRA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 571 511 3. SMT K VAISHALI D/O K KRISHNAPPA W/O M MAHESHA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO.226, CH 17 5TH MAIN CROSS, SARASWATHIPURAM MYSOREV – 570 009 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S P RAMESHA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R R1 TO R3 IN CP 573/14) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 12.8.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.27/2012 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, RAMANAGARA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 4.2.2012 PASSED IN OS.NO.21/2005 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RAMANAGARA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: ******* CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12168 RSA No. 1506 of 2014 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the subject property was acquired by the National Highways Authority of India for the formation of Bengaluru-Mysuru Highways, NH-275, in 2014. The appellant has received the compensation amount in 2016 for NHAI having acquired the said site. The respondent’s property was also acquired by the NHAI and paid the compensation to them. Therefore, the appellant seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20