Pendlimarri Siva Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/1762/2026 · 2026-01-28
B Krishna Mohan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15128 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15128 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010024742026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 1762/2026 Between:
1. PENDLIMARRI SIVA KUMAR,, S/O PENDLIMARRI MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURIST, R/O KOTHANELLERU, CHEMULLAPALLE, KHAJIPETA MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. PENDLIMARRI MALLIKARJUNA,, S/O PENDLIMARRI MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURIST,
R/O KOTHANELLERU, CHEMULLAPALLE, KHAJIPETA MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA REVENUE DIVISION, KADAPA Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, KHAJIPET MANDAL Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.4 in interfering with our rights over the land in an extent of Ac.6.27 cents in L.P.No.1663(Old Sy.No.477), of Chemullapalli Village fields,
2
Khajipeta Mandal, Y.S.R.Kadapa District by erecting iron fencing, without adhering to due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and violative of fundamental and Constitutional rights guaranteed to us under Articles, 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with our rights over the land in an extent of Ac.6.27 cents in L.P.No.1663(Old Sy.No.477), of Chemullapalli Village fields, Khajipeta Mandal, Y.S.R.Kadapa District IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with our rights over the land in an extent of Ac.6.27 cents in L.P.No.1663(Old Sy.No.477), of Chemullapalli Village fields, Khajipeta Mandal, Y.S.R.Kadapa, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3
The Court made the following ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2.
This Writ Petition was filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with the petitioners’ rights over the land in an extent of Ac.6.27 cents in L.P.No.1663 (Old Sy.No.477) of Chemullapalli Village fields, Khajipeta Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District by erecting iron fencing, without adhering to the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 21.01.2026, submits that as per the RSR of the Chemullapalle Village of Khajipet Mandal, the land in Sy.No.477 to an extent of Ac.6.26 cents is classified as patta land and as per the Webland Adangal, the said land having LPM No.1663 (old Sy.No.477) in an extent of Ac.6.27 cents is noted in favour of Sri Pendlimarri Siva Kumar, S/o. Mallaiah vide Khata No.919 and he is in possession of the said land and at present, the said land is vacant with no crop and the 4th respondent is not interfering with the petitioners’ own land. Since, the other instructions are outside the scope of the Writ Petition, the same are not considered in this case. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances and upon the specific instructions of the 4th respondent dated 21.01.2026, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. 4
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
29.01.2026 SCH
5
378 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
W.P.No.1762 of 2026
Date: 29.01.2026
SCH