Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15119 (RAJ)

SATYANARAYAN S/O SHRI PANCHU RAM PRAJAPAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/812/2026 · 2026-01-20

Maneesh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2418] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 812/2026 Satyanarayan S/o Shri Panchu Ram Prajapat, Age About 69 Years, R/o Village Fagi, Tehsil Fagi, Distt. Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. Sub-Divisional Officer, Fagi, Distt. Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Fagi, Distt. Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Banwari Lal Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Village Madhorajpura, Tehsil Fagi, Distt. Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T. C. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. V. D. Gathala, AGC with Ms. Praveshika Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the following prayers: "A. It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may kindly be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition with limited prayer to issue direction to make the encroachment free Rasta, in Khasra No.4073/3232 situated village Fagi, Tehsil Fagi, Distt. Jaipur Rajasthan. B. Honourable Court may kindly be issue direction to ensure the order dated 30.10.2025 passed by Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur. C. Any other which this Honourable Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner;" 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; he is permitted to file a representation before respondent No.1 - State [2026:RJ-JP:2418] (2 of 2) [CW-812/2026] Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Jaipur Rajasthan, encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition within a period of one (01) week from today; and if a direction may kindly be issued to respondent No.1 to decide the same in a time-bound manner. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.1 - State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Jaipur Rajasthan, within a period of one (01) week from today. Respondent No.1 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner's grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 6. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 7. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/5