Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15119 (KAR)

SMT PANKAJA M v. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

WP/21575/2025 · 2026-02-10

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8061 WP No. 21575 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 21575 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT PANKAJA M W/O LATE NANDISHA B AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS MADUVANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA -571440 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. JAHNAVI MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R GOULAY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571440. 2. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICE CDPO (HEAD OFFICE) KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571440 REP. BY ITS DEPUTY DIRECTOR. 3. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICE CDPO (REGIONAL OFFICE) MADHUVANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571440 REP. BY ITS CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER 4. SMT. BHAGYA.N W/O LATE BASAVARAJU Digitally signed by MALATHI CHALUVA IYENGAR Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8061 WP No. 21575 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MADHUVANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJANAGAR-571440. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANITHA N., AGA FOR R1 TO R3: SRI SUNIL S NARAYAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO IMMEDIATELY ISSUE THE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT TO THE PETITIONER AS ANGANAWADI WORKER AT MADHUVANAHALLI AND IN VIEW OF THE DISMISSAL OF WP NO. 20240/2022 DATED 26/03/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 08.07.2024 vide Annexure-C, passed by the second respondent, appointing the fourth respondent in place of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi worker by order dated 20.09.2022 vide Annexure-A. The petitioner's appointment was called in question by respondent No.4 - Smt.Bhagya before this Court in WP - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8061 WP No. 21575 of 2025 No.20240/2022. In the said writ petition there was no interim order staying the appointment of the petitioner. This Court, by order dated 13.04.2023 vide Annexure-B, allowed the writ petition and set aside the appointment order of the petitioner dated 20.09.2022. Thereafter, the petitioner herein filed a review petition in RP No. 275/2023. This Court, by Order dated 10.09.2024 vide Annexure-D allowed the review petition. The relevant paragraph is extracted below: “6. Having taken note of the factual aspects on record, as the review petitioner is the respondent No.4 in W.P.No.20240 of 2022, I am of the view that, as the reasons stated in paragraph 7 of the order dated 13.04.2023 has been made without considering the extended period for filing the application for the post of Anganawadi Worker and therefore, I am of the view that, review petition requires to be allowed and accordingly, the review petition is allowed. Order dated 13.04.2023 in W.P.No.20240 is set aside and the writ petition is restored to file. It is made clear that the respondent-authorities are directed not to disturb the entire arrangement as same may affect the children in the Anganawadi.” - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8061 WP No. 21575 of 2025 3. In the meanwhile, the respondent No.2 appointed respondent No.4 by impugned order dated 08.07.2024 vide Annexure-C on the basis of the order passed by this Court in WP No.20240/2022 disposed of on 13.04.2023. In view of recalling the order dated 13.04.2023 passed in WP No.20240/2022 in R.P.No.275/2023, the appointment order of the respondent No.4 vide Annexure-C has to be withdrawn by the respondent No.2. Since the respondent No.2 has not withdrawn that order, the petitioner is before this Court challenging Annexure C. 4. In view of recalling the order dated 13.04.2023 in WP No.20240/2022, the impugned order at Annexure C has to be set aside. Accordingly, the following order: (i) The writ petition stands disposed of. (ii) The appointment order of the petitioner dated 20.09.2022 vide Annexure A is restored subject to the result of W.P.No.20240/2022. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8061 WP No. 21575 of 2025 (iii) The respondent No.2 is directed to continue the petitioner as Anganawadi worker, Madhuvanahalli Anganawadi Centre. (iv) It is made clear that the restoration of Annexure A and continuation of the petitioner as Anganawadi worker is subject to the result of the writ petition which is filed by the respondent No.4 in WP No.20240/ 2022. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 51