KALEPALLI VENKATESU v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/1688/2026 · 2026-02-09
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15113 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15113 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010024682026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos: 1688 and 2544 of 2026
W.P.No.1688 of 2026 Between:
1. KALEPALLI VENKATESU, S/o.Subrahmanyam Aged about 52 years Occ. Business R/o.H.No.9-50/10, Daminedu village Tirupathi Rural, Tirupathi District 517503 ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur Dist-522238
2. The Directorate of Town and Country Planning, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District - 522238
3. The District Collector, .Tirupati District at Tirupati - 517501
4. The Timpati Urban Development Authority, TUDA 'Towers, TUDA Office Road Near Vegetable Market,Tirupati Tirupati District -517501
5. Union of India, Rep.by its Secretary to Government of India Department of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi - 110001
6. The Revenue Divisional Officercum Land Acquisition officer, Tirupati Tirupati District- 517501
7. The Tahsildar, Tirupathi Rural, Tirupathi District 517501
2
...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: K VISWANATHAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents:K K DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents:GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP W.P.No.2544 OF 2026 Between:
1. KALEPALLI VENKATESU, S/0.Subrahmanyam, Aged about 52 years Occ Business R/o.H.No.9-50/10, Daminedu village Tirupathi Rural, Tirupathi District 517503 ...Petitioner AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur Dist-522238
2. The Directorate of Town and Country, Planning Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District - 522238
3. The District Collector, Tirupati District at Tirupati - 517501
4. The Tirupati Urban Development Authority, Rep by its Vice Chairman TUDA Towers, TUDA Office Road Near Vegetable Market,Tirupati Tirupati District - 517501
5. Union of India, Rep.by its Secretary to Government of India Department of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi - 110001
6. The Revenue Divisional Officercum Land Acquisition officer, , Tirupati Tirupati District - 517501
7.
The Tahsildar, Tirupathi Rural, Tirupathi District 517501 ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: KUMAR MARPU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents:GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP Counsel for the Respondents:Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA
3
The Court made the following ORAL COMMON ORDER:
Heard Sri K. Viswanatham, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.1688 of 2026 and Sri M. Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.2544 of 2026. 2. Sri K. Viswanatham, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.1688 of 2026 and Sri M. Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.2544 of 2026 would submit that they have received instructions from the Writ Petitioners to withdraw these two Writ Petitions. 3. Having recorded the same, the W.P.No.1688 & 2544 of 2026 are dismissed as withdrawn. No Order as to Costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 10.02.2026 JKS
4
53
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION Nos: 1688 and 2544 of 2026
10.02.2026
JKS