SUNITA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS
COPC/543/2026 · 2026-07-10
Sushil Kukreja
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15110 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15110 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
. ( 2026:HHC:28015 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.543 of 2026 Date of decision: 10.07.2026 Sunita Devi & Ors. ….Petitioners Versus Abhishek Jain & Ors. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Shivani, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Deputy Advocate General, has placed on record communication dated 02.072026 along with copy of office orders dated 06.05.2026 & 23.06.2026, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to judgment dated 06.01.2026, passed in CWP No339/2026, the representations of the petitioners have been considered and decided vide orders dated 06.05.2026 & 23.06.2026.
2. Therefore, in view of the above, as the judgment under reference has been duly complied with, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?
2 . ( 2026:HHC:28015 ) is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to assail the aforesaid office orders dated 06.05.2026 & 23.06.2026, if they still remain aggrieved.
( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge July 10, 2026
(reena)