- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8045 CP No. 413 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA CIVIL PETITION NO. 413 OF 2024 BETWEEN: MRS. C.A. MANASA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, W/O. SRI. BHARATH S., R/AT. RAJATADRI, SHVAKUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, OPPOSITE TO TALUK OFFICE, NEAR GANESHA TEMPLE, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 571 604. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUHAS S., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. S. BHARATH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O. SRI. M.N. SHAMANNA, R/OF NO.3, 3RD MAIN, 2ND CROSS, BANAGIRINAGAR, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU - 560 085 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. CHAKRAPANI S.G., ADVOCATE) THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 24 OF THE OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908 PRAYING TO Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8045 CP No. 413 of 2024 ALL THE PETITION AND THEREBY ORDER FOR TRANSFER OF M.C.NO.7802 OF 2023 PENDING BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU AS PER ANNEXURE-A TO THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI, TUMAKUR DISTRICT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. This petition is filed by the wife for transfer of M.C.No.7802/2023 filed by the husband for divorce before the IV Additional Principal Judge Family Court at Bengaluru to Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Chikkanayakanahalli, Tumkur District. 3. It is stated that after their marriage they are also blessed with a child. Petitioner stated that the respondent has filed initially for restitution of conjugal rights and she enclosed the copy of the petition. She filed vakalath and also filed objections. Criminal Case No.174/2023 is filed by her in Chikkanayakanahalli police station and she also filed another case under Section 125 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8045 CP No. 413 of 2024 of Cr.P.C for maintenance in C.Mis.No.526/2023 and she stated that now she is residing with her parents in the said village of Tumkur District. As such, she requested for transfer of the case. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner did not appear. 5. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the respondent and he stated that the case is coming up for cross-examination of the respondent. 6. Therefore, this Court finds that there is no reason to transfer the case at this stage. Hence, the petition being devoid of merit is dismissed. In view of the dismissal of the petition, the interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. SD/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE CR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5