Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15105 (PNJ)

PRITPAL KAUR v. BALJINDER SINGH DHILLON, PCS

COCP/989/2026 · 2026-03-24

Nidhi Gupta

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP- 989-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 232 COCP-989-2026(O&M) Date of Decision: 24.03.2026 Pritpal Kaur & ors. .… Pe00oners Versus Shri Baljinder Singh Dhillon .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate for the pe00oners. Mr. Am0az Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present contempt pe00on has been filed alleging viola0on of order dated 30.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Court in CWP-21549-2025, 0tled as ‘Pritpal Kaur vs. State Transport Commissioner and another’ whereby it was directed that “legal no0ce dated 26.05.2025 submiGed by the pe00oners be decided by the respondents by passing an apporopriate order withing a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order”. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has filed compliance report dated 20.03.2026 by way of affidavit of Baljinder Singh Dhillon, PCS, Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Jalandhar, which is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the pe00oner. Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that in compliance of the Writ Court order, the legal no0ce dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) submiGed by the pe00oners stands duly decided by the MONIKA VERMA 2026.03.25 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment chandigarh COCP- 989-2026 (O&M) -2- respondent vide Speaking Order dated 16.03.2026 (Annexure R-1/1). As such, nothing survives in the present pe00on. 3. Learned counsel for the pe00oners submits that in view of the compliance effected, no further direc0ons are required to be passed and the present pe00on be disposed of. 4. Ordered accordingly. 6. The pe00oners would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Speaking Order, in accordance with law, if so advised or any cause of ac0on s0ll survives. 7 Rule stands discharged. 8. Pending applica0on(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 24.03.2026 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) monika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No MONIKA VERMA 2026.03.25 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment chandigarh