1 2026:CGHC:1501 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 91 of 2024 Anima Adhikari W/o Bibas Adhikari Aged About 27 Years R/o Presently Resident Of Ward Numer 02, Abdul Kalam Nagar Sakri, Battalion Road, Police Station Sakri, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station In-Charge Mahila Thana Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 495001 2. Bibas Adhikari S/o Vaidhyanath Adhikari Aged About 33 Years Plot 14, Room No. 03, Gate No. 06 Malvani Malat West Mumbai, Maharastra. 400095 3. Vaidhyanath Adhikari S/o Late Shri Sudhir Adhikari Aged About 62 Years Plot 14, Room No. 03, Gate No. 06 Malvani Malat West Mumbai, Maharastra. 400095 4. Saimoli Adhikari W/o Vaidhyanath Adhikari Aged About 57 Years Plot 14, Room No. 03, Gate No. 06 Malvani Malat West Mumbai, Maharastra. 400095 ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Madan Yadav, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 09.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. Madan Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.01.15 10:24:14 +0530 2 heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly pleased to allow this petition and set-aside/quash the FIR dated 11.06.2023 by petitioner against the R/2 to R/4 offence under Section 498A, 34 IPC and this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deems fit and appropriate.” 3. Learned State counsel submits that in the present case, charges have already been framed against the petitioner and the matter is now fixed for recording of evidence. In view of the said development, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, in view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan