Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:HHC:26750 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 10859 of 2026
Decided on: 06.07.2026
Shri Mordhawaj
…Petitioner
-Versus-
State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ______________________________________________________________
For the petitioner: Mr. Rakesh K. Dogra, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 4.
Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No. 5.
Ajay Mohan Goel, J. (Oral):
On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation preferred by the petitioner, i.e., Annexure P-6, be decided by the Competent Authority, in terms of the contents thereof, within a period of twelve weeks from today. In the course of deciding the representation, the issue of delays and laches can be taken into
1 Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. ( 2026:HHC:26750 )
consideration by the Competent Authority. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
July 06, 2026 (bhupender)