Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1509 (GAU)

BEGUM FARIDA NASHIMA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/765/2026 · 2026-02-22

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010027812026 2026:GAU-AS:2733 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/765/2026 BEGUM FARIDA NASHIMA WIFE OF DR. AZIBAR RAHMAN, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 26, SUNDAR PATH, NOTBOMA, P.O. AND P.S.- HATIGAON, DIST- KAMRUP M, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GHY-06 2:THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY G.M.C.H. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-781005 (TO BE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN) 3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GMCH ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-781005. 4:IMAMUL ISLAM SON OF LATE DHANO SHEIKH RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 2 BY LANE NO. 1 HAJI MUSAFIR KHANA ROAD P.O.- ULUBARI P.S.- PALTANBAZAR DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM-78100 Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. AR Bhuyan Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. S Bora, Standing Counsel, GMDA B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 23.02.2026 Mr. AR Bhuyan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition and pursue with remedies against the respondent No.4. 2. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. 3. Liberty, however, is granted to the petitioner to pursue remedies only against the respondent No.4. JUDGE Comparing Assistant