[121] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CR-49-2026 in FAO-3737-2013(O&M) Date of Decision :21.04.2026 Col. Karun Bahl …Applicant-Appellant Versus Air Commander Arun Kumar Bahal and others ….Non-applicant/Respondents Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Prateek Garg, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) [1] Mr. Jain, counsel for the applicant-appellant, admits that he has not met the applicant in person till date. As per him, he has been instructed by Mr. Prem Singh Bisla, Advocate to file the present application. [2] Mr. Gupta, counsel for respondent No.1, submits that even today his client(s) had word with the applicant-Col. Karun Bahl son of Shri Amar Nath Bahl. He confided in and apprised the daughters of Arun Kumar Bahl that he has neither instructed Mr. Prem Singh Bisla, Advocate nor Mr. Jain to file the present application. [3] Mr. Jain, counsel for the applicant-appellant, was asked to seek instructions from Mr. Prem Singh Bisla, Advocate as to whether inquiry should be ordered to ascertain whether Mr. Prem Singh Bisla, Advocate, has been instructed by the applicant to file the present application. RA-CR-49-2026 in -2- RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.24 13:40 I agree to specified portions of this document FAO-3737-2013(O&M) [4] After seeking instructions, Mr. Jain, counsel for the applicant- appellant, prays for withdrawal of the present application. [5] In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 21.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.24 13:40 I agree to specified portions of this document