M/S. EVOS BUILDCON PVT. LTD., BHUBANESWAR v. SAMEER PATTNAIK
CMP/661/2026 · 2026-05-04
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15087 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15087 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.661 of 2026 M/s. EVOS Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneswar …. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Rath, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Haraprasad Panda, Advocate -versus-
Sameer Pattnaik …. Opposite Party
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 04.05.2026
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. Sri Prafulla Kumar Rath, Senior Advocate enters appearance on behalf of the Petitioner in the present case by filing a memorandum in court today and the same be kept on record.
3. Heard Sri P.K.Rath, learned Senior Counsel along with Mr.H.P. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner. Perused the CMP Application as well as the prayer made therein.
4. The defendant in CS No.2368 of 2022 pending in the court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Bhubaneswar, has approached this Court with a prayer for a direction to the learned Trial Court to expedite the hearing of the suit and p. 2 to conclude the same in a time being manner.
5. On perusal of the plaint of the suit which has been annexed to the CMP Application, it appears that the suit was filed by the Opposite Party in the year 2022.
6. Taking into consideration the fact that the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bhubaneswar is over-burdened with many such suits and that there are year-able suits pending before him for adjudication, it is difficult to pass any specific
order at this stage. However, taking into
consideration the submissions made by learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, he is granted liberty to move an application before the learned trial Court within two weeks with a prayer for early disposal of the suit. In the event any such application is filed, the learned trial Court shall consider the same, keeping in view, the pendency of the year-able cases as well as the convenience of the Court to take up any such suit on the ground of urgency to be satisfied by the counsel for the Petitioners and pass a final
order of such application within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of a copy of today’s order.
7. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the CMP Application stands disposed of.
(Aditya Kumar Mohapatra)
Judge
Sashikant