[2026:RJ-JP:835] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 254/2026 1. Jai Hanuman Stone Crusher, Plot No. 61-C, Crushing Zone, Pali Village Pali Faridabad, Haryana, Through Proprietor Vijay Kumar Singhal S/o Raghu Nandan Singhal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o House No. 204, Ward No. 19, Sector 16, Daulatabad, Sector 16, Post Sector 16, District Faridabad, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. HR 38 AB 2754 2. Singhal Bio Resources Prop., Vijay, H.No. 204, Sector 16, Kheri Kalan, District Faridabad, Through Proprietor Vijay Kumar Singhal S/o Raghu Nandan Singhal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o House No. 204, Ward No. 19, Sector 16, Daulatabad, Sector 16, Post Sector 16, District Faridabad, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. HR 38 AA 0454 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan). 5. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore on behalf of Mr. S. S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order [2026:RJ-JP:835] (2 of 3) [CW-254/2026] 09/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2 2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners were suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the petitioners were not afforded the opportunity of hearing and that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. 3. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to the condition that the petitioners will produce their vehicle before the Transport Department, who will examine and inspect the vehicles’ make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. 4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicles to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/inspection and shall not authorize the vehicle to ply on the road for any other purpose. 5. The petitioners, along with their vehicles concerned, shall report to/ before the respective DTO who passed the order of suspension of registration of the subject vehicles, on 27.01.2026, 1 S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025 2 S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025 [2026:RJ-JP:835] (3 of 3) [CW-254/2026] preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioners. 6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 11.02.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/73