FA 246/15 & Ors. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 929 FIRST APPEAL NO. 246 OF 2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS ANANDA RAMJI TATHE ... AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. B.A. Shinde Advocate for Respondent/claimant : Mr. D.A. Bide h/f. Mr. C.K. Sonawane … 328 FIRST APPEAL NO. 209 OF 2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS KADUBA KHANDU TATHE AND ANOTHER ... AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. S.S. Dande Advocate for Respondent/claimant : Mr. D.A. Bide h/f. Mr. C.K. Sonawane … 330 FIRST APPEAL NO. 245 OF 2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS TRIMBAK GANPAT TATHE ... AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. D.R. Korde Advocate for Respondent/claimant : Mr. D.A. Bide h/f. Mr. C.K. Sonawane … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Dated : September 30, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard the respective learned AGP for appellants and Mr. D.A. Bide h/f. Mr. C.K. Sonawane for original claimants. 2. By these appeals, the Appellants assail the Judgment and award dated 11.2.2011 passed by the learned VIth Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad in L.A.R. Nos. 92/1998, 94/1998 and 91/1998. 3. Both the learned advocate submit that the compensation enhanced 2026:BHC-AUG:46252 FA 246/15 & Ors. 2 by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/