Nalla Bhaskar Rao and 3 others v. The State of Andhra Pradesh and 2 others
WP/1114/2019 · 2026-03-29
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15081 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15081 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010024032019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 1114/2019
Between:
1. NALLA BHASKAR RAO, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SITARAMA PURAM VILLAGE, RAACHURU SHIVARU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. NALLA KRISHNA, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. SITARAMA PURAM VILLAGE, OCC. AGRICULTURE, RAACHURU SHIVARU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. NALLA RAMANA, S/O. LATE RAMU, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SITARAMA PURAM VILLAGE. RAACHURU SHIVARU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. NALLA SUBBA RAO, S/O. APPA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. SITARAMA PURAM VILLAGE, RAACHURU SHIVARU, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL.
SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, UNGUTURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI
2 DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to conduct the survey and fix boundaries of the petitioners’ property in an extent of 132 sq. yards and 135 sq. yards situated in Sy. No. 484 of Sitarama Puram Village, Raachuru Shivaru, Unguturu Mandal, West Godavari District by considering the application of the petitioners dated
21.01.2019.
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent 2 and 3 to conduct the survey and fix boundaries of the petitioners property in an extent of 132 sq. yards and 135 sq. yards situated in Sy No. 484 of Sitararna Puram Village, Raachuru Shivaru, Unguturu Mandal, West Godavari District by considering the application of the petitioners dated 21.01.2019, pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. RAMBABU SAMBANGI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2.
The Court made the following
3
ORDER:
When the matter was listed on 10.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and, consequently, the matter was directed to be listed next week. On 17.03.2026, when the matter was listed, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the matter was directed to be listed next under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’.
2. Even today, when the matter is listed under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
3. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioners is not interested to prosecute the matter.
4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:30.03.2026 DSH