ANKUSH RAJ AWASTHI v. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited
CWP/11029/2026 · 2026-07-10
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15076 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15076 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 11029 of 2026
Decided on: 10.07.2026
Ankush Raj Awasthi
…….Petitioner
Versus
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and others
… Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?12 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned Counsel for the petitioner has made
submissions purely on the basis of enquiry report but the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority on the said enquiry report in terms of Rule 15 of the CCS(CCA) Rules has not been appended with the petition. Learned Counsel for the petitioner could not assist the Court as to what order actually was passed by the Disciplinary Authority. Under these circumstances, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw present petition, with liberty to approach the Court afresh by appending all necessary documents. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand
disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge July 10, 2026 (narender)
12 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?