ELAMUDEEN S/O SHRI KAMRUDEEN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/358/2026 · 2026-01-27
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15074 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15074 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3475] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 358/2026 Elamudeen S/o Shri Kamrudeen, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Purani Ginani, Koriyo Ka Was, Police Station Sadar, Bikaner District Bikaner. (Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 27/01/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.480/2025 registered with the Police Station Murlipura, District Jaipur (West) for offence under Sections 308(2) and 351(2) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. The learned earned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been implicated in this case with false and fabricated facts. He also submits that the complainant party is having some dispute with regard to money transaction with one M/s Akshita Trading Company, Nai Anaj Mandi Bajju, Bikaner (in short ‘Company’). He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been engaged as an agent by the Company and when he came to demand the dues on behalf of the Company, the complainant party so as to create pressure, has lodged this
[2026:RJ-JP:3475] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-358/2026] criminal case against the him with false and fabricated facts. He further submits that the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and all the offences alleged against the present accused-petitioner, are triable by the Magistrate. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 14.12.2025 and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that five other criminal cases are also pending against the present accused-petitioner.
4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the offences alleged against him, are triable by the Magistrate, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is
directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before
[2026:RJ-JP:3475] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-358/2026] that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /156