Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15074 (ALL)

CHANDRAVEER ALIAS CHHOTU v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/43054/2025 · 2026-10-05

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43054 of 2025 Court No. - 68 (Sl. No. 126 out of 190) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Ms. Priyanka Devi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shubham Kumar, learned Advocate holding brief for Sri Gaurav Srivastav, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri R.M. Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 192 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS, Police Station Naseerpur, District Firozabad, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He had taken the amount as a business transaction and is ready to remit back the said amount. The applicant is languishing in jail since 15.10.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Rajput, Manish Yadav, Monika Pal, Priyanka Devi, Raj Kumar Sharma, Satya Narayan Yadav, Vijay Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Gaurav Srivastav, Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Chandraveer Alias Chhotu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the submission that applicant is ready to remit back the said amount credited to his account and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Chandraveer Alias Chhotu, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that the applicant shall remit back the amount credited to his account within a period of three months from his release; that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. October 6, 2026 Shalini BAIL No. 43054 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad