- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17337 RFA No. 1040 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1040 OF 2024 (DEC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KANAKAMMA W/O. VENKATESHULU AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT NO.113, JAYAMMA BUILDING MEDAHALLI VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560049 2. SMT. NAGARATHNA D/O. VENKATESHULU W/O. JAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO.55, 2ND MAIN 3RD CROSS, MEDAHALLI EXTENSION VIRGONAGAR POST BENGALURU - 560049 3. SMT. CHANDRAKALA W/O. GUNASHEKAR D/O. VENKATESHULU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.113, JAYAMMA BUILDING MEDAHALLI VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR POST BENGALURU 560049 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. BABU D R., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17337 RFA No. 1040 of 2024 AND: 1. MR. ROSHAN MANAVALAN S/O. SRI. T MANAVALAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NEW NO.22, OLD NO.20 GOPALKRISHNA ROAD, T.NAGAR CHENNAI - 600017 2. MR. SHARATH MANAVALAN S/O. SRI. T. MANAVALAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RA/T NEW NO.22, OLD NO.20 GOPALKRISHNA ROAD, T.NAGAR CHENNAI - 600017 3. MR. RAMESH S/O. LATE VENKATESHULU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO.319, OM SAI NILAYA 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS NEAR SATSANG ASHRAM MEDAHALLI VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560049 4. MR. RAJ KUMAR S/O. LATE VENKATESHULU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.113, JAYAMMA BUILDING MEDAHALLI VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560049 …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.02.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.III IN OS NO.1793/2018 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17337 RFA No. 1040 of 2024 BENGALURU., ALLOWING THE IA NO.III FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE (a) AND (d) OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation for the appellants. 2. The office objections are not complied, despite granting six opportunities. 3. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. In view of dismissal of main appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any do not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4