APHC010025922026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 2241/2026 Between: 1. SMT. APPOLU LAKSHMI, W/O A.ASIREDDY, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O AT MONAPALEM VILLAGE PUDILAYADORUVU POST, VAKADU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT -524415 ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT, OF REVENUE , SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI-522237 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI-517501 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SULLURUPETA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT-524121 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, VAKADU VAKADU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT -524415 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or orders declaring the 0 action of the 4th respondent herein in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the residential house in an extent of 0-05 cents in Sy.NO.30 or 31 classified as dibba poramboke/gramakantam situated at Pudirayadoruvu village accounts. Vakadu Mandal, Tirupati District, despiteShe filed the appeal under sec. 10 of AP Land Encroachment Act before the 3rd respondent RDO, Sullurupeta against the orders under sec. 6 of the APLE Act 3 of 1905 dt.26-12-2025 as wholly arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and void and violated the principles 2 of natural justice and affected his rights guaranteed under article 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondent authorities not to dispossess the petitioner from his residential house new constructed in an extent of Ac. 0-05 cents in Sy.No.30 or in Sy.No.31 classified as Gramakantam or Dibbaporamboke situated at Pudirayadoruvu village accounts, Vakadu Mandal, Tirupati District pending disposal of the Appeal before the 3rd respondent RDO, Sullurupeta and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent N0.4 herein not to dispossess the petitioner from the newly constructing residential building in an extent of 0-05 cents either in Sy.No.30 or, 31 classified as gramakantam or Dibba Poramboke situated at Pudirayadoruvu village accounts, Vakadu Mandal, Tirupati District pending disposal of the appeal before the 3rd respondent RDO pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This Writ Petition was filed declaring the action of the 4th respondent herein in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the residential house in an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.30 or 31 classified as dibba poramboke/gramakantam situated at Pudirayadoruvu Village accounts. Vakadu Mandal, Tirupati District, despite the petitioner filed the appeal under Section 10 of Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act before the 3rd respondent RDO, Sullurupeta against the orders under Section 6 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 3 of 1905, dated 26.12.2025. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 28.01.2026, submits that the appeal filed before the 3rd respondent is pending for consideration and the same will be disposed of by following the due procedure. The said written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 28.01.2026 shall be made as part of the Court record. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances and upon consideration of the rival submissions made, the 3rd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of the 4th respondent dated 26.12.2025, strictly, in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioner, giving due 4 opportunity, upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits. The said exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. It is open for the petitioner to seek interim relief, if any, before the said appellate authority. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 28.01.2026 SCH 5 303 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN W.P.No.2241 of 2026 Date: 28.01.2026 SCH