Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010094792026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2607/2026 DILIP KUMAR DUTTA SON OF LATE SONACHAND DUTTA, RESIDENT OF RONGPUR PT. IV,RAJPATH ROAD, P.O. - RONGPUR,SILCHAR, P.S.-SILCHAR, DISTRICT.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788009. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY,GOVT. OF ASSAM, PENSION DEPARTMENT, SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR,ASSAM, PIN 781006. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BYTHE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARYGOVT. OF ASSAM ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGEDEPARTMENT DISPUR PIN 781006. 3:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE ASSAM ARANYA BHAWAN PANJABARIGUWAHATI-781037. 4:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER CACHAR P.O P.S. SILCHAR CACHARASSAM PIN- 788001. 5:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MADAIMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-781029 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R SODIAL, MS S Z HAYAT,MR. RAJIB ALI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, AG (A AND E),SC, FOREST Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 23.09.2026 Heard Mr. M. R. Sodial, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Borah, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1; Mr. S. Sharma, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 2, 3 & 4; and Ms. Tinlung, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Mr. R. K. Talukdar, learned standing counsel, Accountant General(A&E), Assam, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 5. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for inclusion of the name of his wife i.e. Smti. Dipali Roy Dutta as a nominee in the Service Book of the petitioner for receiving the family pension in the event of his death. 3. Mr. Sodial, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the prayer made in the present writ petition has been substantially complied with by including the name of the wife of the petitioner in his Service Book for receiving family pension on account of the death of the pensioner. He, therefore, submits that this writ petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous. 4. The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. 5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant