SHIVAJI NANABHAU BHAVAR v. SADASHIV DAGDU WAKHURE DIED THROUGH LRS KUSUM SADASHIVV WAKHURE AND ORS
CA/9473/2025 · 2026-10-05
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15056 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15056 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 1 ) 69 ca 9472.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 69 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9472 OF 2025 IN SAST/23102/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9473 OF 2025 IN SAST/23102/2025 SHIVAJI NANABHAU BHAVAR VERSUS SADASHIV DAGDU WAKHURE DIED THROUGH LRS KUSUM SADASHIV WAKHURE AND ORS ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sunil A. Nimbalkar h/f. Amol Subhash Gandhi …..
CORAM :
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 05.10.2026 P.C.:- Application for delay:
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 290 days caused in filing the appeal.
2. Perused the application. Heard the learned advocate for applicant.
3. On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. 2026:BHC-AUG:46552
( 2 ) 69 ca 9472.25
4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. Appeal:
5. The learned advocate for the appellant, on written instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. The said instructions are marked as ‘X1’ for identification.
6. Leave granted. Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of written instructions. Pending civil applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.]
mubashir