IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.827 of 2026 Decided on: 10.07.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Murari Lal ...Petitioner Versus H.P.S.E.B. Ltd. and another ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents-Board has produced copies of office order and letter dated 24.06.2026, issued by the Sr. Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, HPSEBL, Mandi (HP), which are taken on record. 2. A perusal of the aforesaid office order dated 24.06.2026, reveals that the pay of the petitioner has been fixed on notional basis, on the analogy of Nanak Chand’s case. 3. Since, this Court while passing the judgment dated 26.05.2025, in CWP No.8637 of 2025, titled, Murari Lal vs. HPSEBL & Anr., had only given the direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 petitioner in light of the judgment passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in SLP(C) No.10719-10720 of 2025, titled, Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. vs. Nanak Chand & Ors., and the respondents-Board has now passed an office order dated 24.06.2026, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, he shall be at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy, in accordance with law. 4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 10 th July , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge