[2026:RJ-JP:1138] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 225/2026 Gaurishankar Saini S/o Umdaram Saini, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Nimuchana Police Station Basdayal Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputali Behror. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 12/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 165/2025, registered with the Police Station, Basdayal, District Kotputli-Behror for offence punishable u/S 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) of B.N.S. 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that as per contents of the First Information Report, the allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he inflicted a lathi blow on the head of the injured Resham. He further submits that the injury report of Resham has been placed on record as Annexure-6, wherein it is revealed that she has sustained four injuries out of which injury numbers two to four have been opined to be simple in nature and the result of injury number one has been kept reserved. He also submits that the X-ray report as regards the injury number one is also placed on record as Annexure no. 6 and as per this report [2026:RJ-JP:1138] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-225/2026] injury number one is found to be simple in nature. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner has also placed on record the certificate issued by the Bar Association, Bansur, which shows that the accused-petitioner is a lawyer practising at Bansur and enrolled since 1998. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the allegation against the accused- petitioner is of serious nature. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and also the fact that the injury attributed to him has been found to be simple in nature, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station, Basdayal, District Kotputli-Behror in F.I.R. No. 165/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from [2026:RJ-JP:1138] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-225/2026] disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /176