Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2026 DAILYLAW 15042 (RAJ)
ANJU DEVI WIFE OF NARENDRA CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/131/2026 · 2026-02-17
Bhuwan Goyal
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15042 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15042 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:7474] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 131/2026 Anju Devi Wife of Narendra Chaudhary, Resident of Plot No. 3-A, Azad Nagar, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. (Raj). ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Commissioner of Police, Jaipur (Raj). 3. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Jaipur (West), Jaipur (Raj). 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur ( West), Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Purushottam Lal Hissaria, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Addl. GA Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 17/02/2026
1. ;kph@ifjokfn;k dh vksj ls mDr ,dyihB vkijkf/kd fofo/k ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 528 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 220@2025] iqfyl Fkkuk& fcank;dk] ftyk& t;iqj¼if'pe½] vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 316¼2½] 318¼3½] 318¼4½] 351¼2½] 351¼3½] 79] 61¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk ds fu"i{k] izHkkoh o 'kh?kz vuqla/kku dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
2. fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph@ifjokfn;k dk dFku gS fd izdj.k esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 220@2025 esa izHkkoh ,oa fu"i{k :i ls vuqla/kku ugha fd;k tk jgk gS] vr% izdj.k esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh dks funsZ'k fn;s tkos fd izdj.k esa ;Fkk'kh?kz izHkkoh ,oa fu"i{k vuqla/kku dh dk;Zokgh djsA
[2026:RJ-JP:7474] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-131/2026]
3. fo}ku vfrfjDr jktdh; vf/koDrk us ;kfpdk dk fojks/k djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd izLrqr ekeys esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk fu;ekuqlkj 'kh?kz] izHkkoh ,oa fu"i{k :i ls vuqla/kku fd;k tk jgk gS ,oa lkFk gh dFku fd;k fd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2008 Supreme Court 907 ds vuqlkj vuqla/kku ds i;Zos{k.k djus dh vf/kdkfjrk eftLVªsV dks miyC/k gS fQj Hkh ;kph@ifjokfn;k dks ;fn dksbZ O;Fkk gS rks og lacaf/kr vf/kdkfjrk okys eftLVsªV U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj dk;Zokgh djus gsrq Lora= gSA
4. eSaus i=koyh dk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij xEHkhjrkiwoZd euu fd;kA
5. ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Sakiri Vasu (Supra) ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj lacaf/kr vf/kdkfjrk okys eftLVsªV U;k;ky; dks vuqla/kku dk i;Zos{k.k djus dh vf/kdkfjrk izkIr gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa ;fn ;kph@ifjokfn;k dks mDr vuqla/kku ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ O;Fkk gS rks og lacaf/kr vf/kdkfjrk okys eftLVsªV U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksdj pkjktksgh djus gsrq Lora= gSA
6.
;kph@ifjokfn;k dh vksj ls ;fn dksbZ izkFkZuk i= fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS] rks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ls ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd os mDr izkFkZuk i= dk fof/k vuqlkj 'kh?kzrk ls fuLrkj.k djssaxsA
7. vr% mijksDRk U;kf;d n`"Vkar esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, mDr ;kfpdk mijksDr vuqlkj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA
8. izdj.k ls lacaf/kr ;fn dksbZ vU; izkFkZuk i= yafcr gksa] rks os Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA (BHUWAN GOYAL),J RAHUL KUMAR KHANDELWAL /25