Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15041 (RAJ)

DURGESH KUMAR S/O BABULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

/199/2026 · 2026-01-12

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1171] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 199/2026 1. Durgesh Kumar S/o Babulal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No 25 Saint Marriage School Ke Pass Mahaveer Colony Ramganj Mandi Police Station Ramganjmandi District Kota Rural (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) 2. Nilesh Kumar S/o Chittarlal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Hanuman Mandir Ke Piche Bhim Shankarcolony Ward No 25 Ramganj Mandi Police Station Ramganjmandi District Kota Rural (Raj.) At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Bhawani Mandi Distirct Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 200/2026 Nikhil Nama S/o Vishnu Nama, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Shriram Colony Ramganjmandi District Kota Rural (Raj) At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 12/01/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:1171] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-199/2026] 1. These second bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused- applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 397/2025 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) of BNS and 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the charge sheet has been filed. It is submitted that the applicants are innocent and they were not the main accused. It is submitted that the main accused in the matter is Kanhaiya Lal. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted by that there are 45 complaints from different parts of the country on the National Cyber Crime Portal and that the present is an organized crime. 4. Considering the enormous number of antecedents of the applicants on the National Cyber Crime Portal, this Court draws an inference that the applicants are prone to get indulged in such offences and is therefore not inclined to entertain the second bail applications. 5. Accordingly, these bail applications are dismissed. 6. A copy of present order be placed in the connected application. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /153-154