Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1504 (CAL)

SIDDHARTHA BISWAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/4858/2023 · 2026-01-15

Amrita Sinha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15-01-2026 Item No.10 Subrata Bhattacharyya AR(C) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA No.4858 of 2023 Siddhartha Biswas -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury Ms. Shreyeta Mitra Ms. Pritha Biswas …for the petitioner Mr. Arindam Chattopadhyay Ms. Lipika Chatterjee …for the State Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy …for WBCSSC Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya Mr. Bibek Datta …for the Board 1. The application of the petitioner for transfer stood rejected on the grounds that the petitioner is a single teacher in the concerned subject. 2. Whether a single teacher can be transferred or not has been answered by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court on 31st July, 2025 in FMA 995 of 2025 with IA No.: CAN 1 of 2025 Rupak Dhua Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. wherein the Court took note of the notification dated 3rd January, 2022 amending the West Bengal School Service Commission (General Transfer, Transfer on Special Grounds and Reallocation) Rules, 2015. 3. The Court was of the opinion that the aforesaid notification states that it would be an obligation on the part of the District Inspector of Schools (SE) to take urgent steps in a time bound manner to search for a teacher on the same subject from nearby schools and make local arrangement so that the teacher of the other school attends the school wherefrom the single teacher had applied for transfer. The petitioner’s claim for transfer cannot be kept in abeyance till a willing teacher is found. 4. The petitioner presses with his claim for transfer. 5. In view of the above, the District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), Kolkata is directed to take steps to consider the petitioner’s application seeking transfer in accordance with the prevailing transfer Rules and in line with the order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in the matter of Rupak Dhua (supra) at the earliest, but positively within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. 6. If the prayer of the petitioner is allowed, then necessary consequential steps in accordance with law shall be taken by the authority. 7. The fate of the application for transfer shall be communicated to the petitioner. 8. Suspension of the Utsashree portal will not stand in the way of the authorities from considering the application of the petitioner. 9. The writ petition stands disposed of. 10. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 10. All parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 11. Certified copy of this order, if applied for, shall be made available to the parties. [Amrita Sinha, J] 2 3