Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15037 (RAJ)

KASHISH BAIRWA D/O PRABHUDAYAL BAIRWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/14/2026 · 2026-01-08

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:679] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 14/2026 1. Kashish Bairwa D/o Prabhudayal Bairwa, aged about 20 Years, R/o Plot No. 50, Purana Gaon, Fatehpura Vatika, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Pintu S/o Raghuveer, aged about 25 Years, R/o Dhanwara, Bharatpur, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, M.I. Road, Jaipur. 4. The SHO, Police Station Vidyadhar Nagar, District Jaipur. 5. The SHO, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur. 6. Prabhudayal Bairwa S/o Revadmal Bairwa, Residing At 59, Puran Gaon, Fatehpur Vatika, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Tulsi Devi Bairwa W/o Prabhudayal Bairwa, Residing At 59, Puran Gaon, Fatehpur Vatika, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishnu Kumar Sharma for Mr. Nikhlesh Katara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.6 and 7 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:679] (2 of 2) [CRLW-14/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Moti Katala Jaipur on 17.12.2025 and same has been registered in the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Kishanpole Zone, Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.6 and 7 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5-Station House Officer, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur and respondent no.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /361