PRAMOD KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER
COPC/778/2026 · 2026-07-10
Romesh Verma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15035 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15035 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.778 of 2026
Date of decision:10.07.2026
Pramod Kumar & another
...Petitioners
Versus
Rakesh Kanwar & another
...Respondents
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
The present petition has been filed alleging defiance of the order as passed by this Court in CWP No.1812 of 2026, dated
26.02.2026.
2.
The case was listed at pre-lunch session and the learned Deputy Advocate General had sought time to obtain current instructions in the matter. Now, he has placed on record office order dated 20.06.2026, whereby the representations filed by the present petitioners have been decided and the order has been passed to that effect.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the
judgment?
-2-
3.
A copy of office order dated 20.06.2026 has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioners. Faced with this situation, he submits that, for the time being, the present petition can be closed, while reserving liberty to the petitioners to revive the present proceedings by filing appropriate application in case any of the grievances of the petitioners still remain unaddressed. Ordered accordingly.
4.
Consequently, the present petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 10th July, 2026. (vt)