TIKAM SINGH S/O KALYAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/70/2026 · 2026-01-09
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15034 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15034 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1021] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 70/2026 Tikam Singh S/o Kalyan Singh, Aged 40 Years, Resident Of Nan- dawat Bhim, Rajasmand ( Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan Through PP
2. Dilip Singh S/o Pratap Singh, Aged about 30 Years, Resi- dent of Hathibhata , Kareda, Bhilwara ( Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Ms. Priyadarshinee Ojha HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 09/01/2026
1. By way of this Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.63/2025 registered at Police Station Todgarh, District Beawar (Rajasthan), for offence punishable under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’)
2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that impugned FIR has been lodged on account of misunderstanding. Counsel submits that now, parties have settled their dispute amicably and complainant does not want to pursue the impugned FIR. Counsel submits that in these circumstances, impugned FIR may be quashed as no purpose would be served by investigating the case further.
[2026:RJ-JP:1021] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-70/2026]
3. Complainant of this case is present in person and has duly been identified by his Counsel. Under his instructions, learned counsel for the complainant submits that complainant does not want to pursue the impugned FIR and on that basis, impugned FIR may be quashed.
4. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and complainant does not want to pursue the impugned FIR and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604 and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed.
5. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.63/2025 registered at Police Station Todgarh, District Beawar (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /160