Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15032 (JHR)

SUBHANM KUMAR ALIAS SUBHAM VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10787/2025 · 2026-02-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:4471 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10787 of 2025 --------- Subham Kumar @ Subham Verma, aged about 24 years, son of Sri Sanjay Kumar Verma, resident of village Azad Mohalla, P.O. Jhumri Telaiya, P.S. Telaiya, District Koderma. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shiv Prasad, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, A.P.P. --------- 03/17.02.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 305 and 334(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. He has falsely been implicated in this case and his name came out on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused Suraj Kumar. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 22.10.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking the period of custody and the fact that charge has already been framed and further, the victim and her father have turned hostile; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Koderma in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 327/2025. 2026:JHHC:4471 2 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 17th February, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 18.02.2026