Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15031 (RAJ)

PURUSHOTTAM YOGI ALIAS MONU S/O SURESH KUMAR YOGI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/258/2026 · 2026-01-22

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2935] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 258/2026 Purushottam Yogi Alias Monu S/o Suresh Kumar Yogi, R/o Sukku Ka Nagla Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Bayana, District Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain Mr. Narendra Prasad Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 22/01/2026 1. This third bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.579/2023 registered at Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 447, 504 & 307 IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the statements of material witnesses recorded during examination before the learned trial Court. [2026:RJ-JP:2935] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-258/2026] 4. Shivdei-the complainant during her examination on 13.10.2025 as PW-1, has stated that she has not seen the incident. She reached the spot lateron. 5. Banay Singh who is said to be an eye-witness recorded as PW-2 during his examination on 13.10.2025 has also stated that he has not seen that who has caused the injury to Vishram and earlier has given the statement as per wishes of the relatives. 6. Hira Devi, the another material witness recorded as PW-3 during her examination on 30.01.2025 has stated that Dinesh, Banesingh, Samay Singh, Monu, Sunita, Papita and Manju were given beating to the deceased-Vishram. 7. Nirmala who has examined as PW-4 on 13.08.2025 has not supported the case of prosecution story and has been declared hostile. 8. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2024 and one of the co-accused, namely, Samay Singh has already been enlarged on bail by this Court on 02.09.2024 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.10701/2024. 9. As per the statement of witness-Hira Devi (PW-3), case of the present accused-petitioner is not distinguishable from the case of co-accused-Samay Singh who has already been enlarged on bail. 10. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also the evidence of the material witnesses as stated above, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:2935] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-258/2026] 11. Accordingly, this third bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /11