APHC010024842010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2109/2010 Between: 1. SADA CHATURVEDI, S/O. LATE C. MURALIDHARUDU DIVER R/O. D. NO. 45-2-60/2/2/5, R.C.NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALAM 1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER O M CIRCLE, S.L.B.H.E. SCHEME SRISHAILAM DAM 2. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER/ O M CIRCLE, S.L.B.H.E. SCHEME SRISHAILAM DAM 3. THE DIRECTOR HYDERABAD A P GENCO, VIDYUTHSOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or directions particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the nature of writ of Mandamus declari the action of the respondents herein in withholding the amount payable to the petitioner for the work carried out vide pursuant to Job Order No. 07/2008 09/SE/O and M/SLBHES/Tech/F.Doc/D.No. 1685/08 dt.16 extension of job Order vide J.O.No. M/SLMW/MM/AET/F, Insp and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents herein to release the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2109/2010 SADA CHATURVEDI, S/O. LATE C. MURALIDHARUDU DIVER R/O. 60/2/2/5, R.C.NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALAM ...PETITIONER AND THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER O M CIRCLE, S.L.B.H.E. SCHEME SRISHAILAM DAM-WEST, MAHABOOBNAGAR DISTRICT. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER/ O M CIRCLE, S.L.B.H.E. SCHEME SRISHAILAM DAM-WEST, MAHABOOBNAGAR DISTRICT. THE DIRECTOR HYDERABAD A P GENCO, VIDYUTHSOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a writ order or directions particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the nature of writ of Mandamus declari the action of the respondents herein in withholding the amount payable to the petitioner for the work carried out vide pursuant to Job Order No. 07/2008 M/SLBHES/Tech/F.Doc/D.No. 1685/08 dt.16 extension of job Order vide J.O.No. 08/2008/09/CEE/O M/SLMW/MM/AET/F, Insp and Caulk/D.No. 1628/09 dt.8-12- and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents herein to release the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI SADA CHATURVEDI, S/O. LATE C. MURALIDHARUDU DIVER R/O. ...PETITIONER THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER O M CIRCLE, S.L.B.H.E. WEST, MAHABOOBNAGAR DISTRICT. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER/ O M CIRCLE, S.L.B.H.E. WEST, MAHABOOBNAGAR DISTRICT. THE DIRECTOR HYDERABAD A P GENCO, VIDYUTHSOUDHA, ...RESPONDENT(S): a praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a writ order or directions particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in withholding the amount payable to the petitioner for the work carried out vide pursuant to Job Order No. 07/2008- M/SLBHES/Tech/F.Doc/D.No. 1685/08 dt.16-2-2009 and 08/2008/09/CEE/O and -2009 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents herein to release the 2 entire amounts due to the job work carried out by the petitioner herein pursuant to the above mentioned job orders and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 2820 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to release the amounts to the petitioner herein for the work carried out by him pursuant to the Job Order No. 07/2008- 09/SE/O&M/SLBHES/Tech/F.Doc/D.No. 1685/08 dt.16-2-2009 and extension of job Order vide J.O.No. 08/2008/09/CEE/O&M/SLMW/MM/AET/F, Insp. & Caulk/D.No.1628/09 dt.8-12-2009 A.P. GENCO by deducting the E.P.F. amounts in respect of 3+1 = 4 divers, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P R PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV 2. C RAGHU(SC FOR AP GENCO) 3. V V SATISH 3 The Court made the following order: On 29.04.2025, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the learned counsel for the petitioner was no more and accordingly the Registry was directed to issue notice to the petitioner. The record reveals that the notice has been duly served on the petitioner. Despite the same, the petitioner did not choose to put up his appearance. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 03.02.2026 MP 4 171 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:2109 of 2010 Date: 03.02.2026 MP