THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A AND E v. SRI RUPAM PHUKAN
I.A.(Civil)/180/2026 · 2026-02-03
Rajesh Mazumdar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1503 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1503 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010013672026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/180/2026 THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL A AND E ASSAM, MAIDAMGAON, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI, PIN781029 VERSUS SRI RUPAM PHUKAN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O PRITAM PHUKAN, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF-H.NO. 1A, ZOO JAPORIGOG PATH, NEAR ASEB SUB STATION, JAPORIGOG, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, PIN781005 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOME A DEPARTMENT DISPUR - 781006.
3:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOME A DEPARTMENT. DISPUR - 781006 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM
FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR-781006 ASSAM 5:DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007.
6:INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMIN) ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007.
7:INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (MPC ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007.
8:DR RUBUL GOGOI CUM PRESENTING OFFICER APS COMMANDANT 3RD APTF BN. KHAJUABEEL 784521 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. C BORUAH, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, MS. B CHETRY,MR R DHAR
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 04-02-2026 Mr. C. Baruah, learned counsel for the applicant/Accountant General who is also been arrayed as the respondent No.8 in W.P(C) No. 6937/2024. The learned Standing counsel for the Accountant General(A & E) has submitted that they are not the necessary party in the writ petition and therefore, prays for striking out their name. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a copy of the I.A(C) has not been served upon and therefore, he cannot answer to the assertion made in the writ petition. Taking note of the submissions made, it is provided that the learned counsel for the applicant shall serve a copy of the I.A(C) on the learned counsel
Page No.# 3/3 for the respondents. However, since the applicant submits that they are not a necessary party to answer the assertion in the writ petition, they are exempted from filing of the affidavit-in-opposition. I.A (C) stands disposed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant