Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15027 (AP)

M GOPALA KRISHNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/4555/2026 · 2026-02-17

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010025222026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 4555/2026 Between: 1. M GOPALA KRISHNA, S/O. VEERA VENKATA VARA PRASAD, R/O KANKIPADU VILLAGE, AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH DEPT., SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 522237 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM 521001 4. GANGURU GRAM PANCHAYATH, GANGURU, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 521139 5. MBMR VIHA GATED COMMUNITY APARTMENTS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, M.BALA MANMADHARAO, MVL LEGEND, PORANKI, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 521137 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents against p. 2 representation dated 20-12-2025 about illegal construction of the 5TH Respondent Gated Community situated within the limits of 4TH respondent panchayath as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently cancel the approved plan issued by the Authority and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to take action against representation dated 20-12- 2025 in respect of illegal construction of the 5TH Respondent gated community pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 18.02.2026 TVN p. 3 10 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.4555 OF 2026 Date : 18.02.2026 TVN