HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 457 of 2016 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Case is called out. No one is present to press the writ petition. 2. Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent is present. 3. After hearing counsel for the respondent and going through material available on record, I find that no interference is required in the order impugned, as the issues no.3, 4 and 5 have been decided against the petitioner, against which, a misc appeal has been filed which has also been dismissed. 4. Writ petition is misconceived and the same stands dismissed. October 9, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupam Laloriya, Pankaj Saksena Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arvind Srivastava, Pushkar Srivastava (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt. Shanti @ Satiya .....Petitioner(s) Vishwanath And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad