- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17320 WP No. 7595 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 7595 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. SYED THASHRIFULLA S/O SYED ATHANULLA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, KHAZI STREET, MOHAMMEDAN BLOCK, BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE-560 004 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHANANJAYA C.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT BANGALORE-560 001 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB- DIVISION, BANGALORE-560 009 Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17320 WP No. 7595 of 2023 4. THASILDAR (ADDITIONAL) BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560 064 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER YELAHANKA TALUK PANCHAYATH, YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 064 6. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER VADEERAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, YALAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE -560 064 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.DHANANJAYA C.P. AND SRI.SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATES- ABSENT) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO WITHDRAW THE LETTER DATED: 24.11.2022 IN ANNEXURE-2 ISSUED BY THE R-4 AND TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS MADE BY THE PETITIONER DATED: 27.02.2023 AND 28.02.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND K AND NOT TO CANCEL THE HAKKU PARTA OF THE PETITIONER AS MENTIONED IN ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17320 WP No. 7595 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The writ petition is of the year 2023. No interim order is granted. When the matter came up before this Court on 24.03.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal on 26.03.2026. Today also, there is no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57