1 2026:CGHC:1104-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 970 of 2025 Fulkumar Jaiswal S/o Shri Purushottam Jaiswal Aged About 46 Years Occupation- Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Presently Working At Government Primary School- Parsabhantha, Block- Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner President of Rationalization Committee, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director/ Secretary Divisional Rationalization Committee Education Division Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector/ President of District Rationalization Committee District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer/ Secretary of District Rationalization Committee District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 6 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)/ President of Rationalization Committee Tahsil- Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 7 - The Block Education Officer/ Secretary of Rationalization Committee Block- Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 8 - The Block Education Officer/ Secretary of Rationalization Committee Block- Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 9 - Premlal Jaiswal Occupation- Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Presently Working At Government Primary School- Pahanda, Block- Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Addl. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 0 8 .01 .2026 1 Heard Mr. Roop Ram Naik, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the respondents/State. 2 By way of present writ appeal under Section 2 of Sub-Section (1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench Act, 2006, the appellant, who was writ petitioner in the writ petition, has challenged the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in WPS No.12693/2025 (Fulkumar Jaiswal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others), by which the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner/appellant herein has been dismissed as infructuous by the learned Single Judge. 3 After arguing at length, learned counsel for the appellant wants to withdraw the instant appeal with the liberty to take recourse to law before the learned Single Judge. 3 4 Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra