Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15015 (AP)

K.Drakshayani, D/o. Late K.Kuppaiah v. The Principal District Judge

WP/27479/2013 · 2026-02-15

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010020742013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 27479/2013 Between: 1. K.DRAKSHAYANI, D/O. LATE K.KUPPAIAH, OCC: UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. NATESH MODALI STREET BY PASS ROAD, MURAKAM BATTU VILLAGE AND POST, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD, REP. BY IT'S REGISTRAR RECRUITMENT 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issued an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, (i) To declaring the action of the 1st respondent in rejecting the application of the petitioner for the post of the Process Servers and Office Subordinates/Attendars Notification No.2/2013 Dt.20.07.2013, as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable, violation of fundamental rights and in breach of G.O.Ms.No.518, Dt.29.06.2013 issued by State 2 Government of Andhra Pradesh (GAD Service-A) and consequently direct the 1st respondent call for the petitioner for interview of Office Subordinates/Attendars and written exam of the Process Servers, (ii) To pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 34058 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent call for the petitioner for interview to the post of the Subordinates/Attendars to be held on 23.09.2013 and permit the petitioner to written examination to the post of Process Servers held on 29.09.2013, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 173461 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GORLE GOPALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 2. N V SUMANTH 3 The Court made the following Order: There is no representation for the petitioner on various occasions and the matter has been posted ‘for dismissal’ today. Today when the matter was called up, there is no representation for the petitioner even today. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecuting the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 16.02.2026 BSM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P. No.27479 of 2013 16-02-2026 BSM